Corporate and Accounting Laws (Amendment) Act 2025
Enhances corporate governance, safeguard shareholders' interests, and strengthen the regulatory framework for public accountants in Singapore.
Background
As part of the Ministry of Finance’s (MOF) and ACRA’s regular review of legislation administered by ACRA, the Corporate and Accounting Laws (Amendment) Bill (the Bill) was passed by Parliament on 5 November 2025.
ACRA will provide sufficient lead time for the implementation of the proposed amendments. Most of the provisions of the Bill are targeted to commence from April 2026 onwards.
Key legislative changes
Overview of key legislative changes
The amendments aim to:
Tighten rules against misuse of companies for unlawful purposes;
Safeguard shareholders’ interests;
Strengthen the regulatory framework for companies;
Reduce regulatory burden for companies; and
Enhance the regulatory regime for public accountants.
The Bill makes amendments to the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority Act 2004, the Accountants Act 2004, the Companies Act 1967 (“CA”), the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 (“IRDA”), the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2005, the Limited Partnerships Act 2008 and the Variable Capital Companies Act 2018. The Bill also makes consequential and related amendments to the ACRA (Registry and Regulatory Enhancements) Act 2024, the Exchanges (Demutualisation and Merger) Act 1999 and the Securities and Futures Act 2001.
Details of key legislative changes
Key legislative changes and reasons for the Corporate and Accounting Laws (Amendment) Bill
Key changes | Reasons for the amendments |
|---|---|
To specify grounds for such refusal for restoration applications. The Court or the Registrar must not restore the name of the entity to the register if there is reason to believe that the entity is likely to be used for unlawful purposes prejudicial to public peace, welfare or good order in Singapore, or it contravenes national security or interests for its name to be restored. | Currently, the law does not explicitly mandate such refusal. The proposed amendment will specify these grounds for refusal, aligning them with the criteria for refusing the registration of a proposed company's constitution under the CA and the grounds for winding up a company under the IRDA. |
Safeguarding Shareholders’ Interests To introduce a two-tier approval process:
Tier 2 will not be applicable if the entire class of shares is being acquired. The amendments allow shareholders within the affected class of shares to have a larger say in the approval process. * Excluding those whose shares are being acquired. | When a company selectively purchases only some shares within a class, it may be unfair to shareholders of that class who are not targeted. The proposed amendment ensures that the members within that class of shares who are not targeted will have a larger say in whether the selective off-market purchase is approved, better safeguarding the rights of shareholders in such scenarios. |
Strengthening Regulatory Framework for Companies
| The proposed amendment provides for stronger penalties to deter potential offenders. |
Reducing Regulatory Burden
| To provide flexibility to companies to determine their opening hours without compromising those who have rights to inspect company records. |
Enhancing Accountability in Auditing
| Today, there is no such requirement and audit opinions are usually signed off by the accounting firm rather than the individual performing the audit. The proposed amendment will promote greater personal accountability for public accountants and transparency for the sector. |
Related resources
Documents related to the Bill's passage through Parliament
Please access the following links for more information on:
