ACRA's enforcement approach
Find out the three factors that affect whether ACRA starts an investigation, and what regulatory tools ACRA may use.
On this page
ACRA's approach to common offences
Common offences include failing to hold annual general meetings (AGMs) or file annual returns (ARs). ACRA uses three approaches to address these:
Education
You can learn about your statutory duties and obligations through the Directors Training Programme. This training is free.
Enforcement
ACRA takes stronger action for serious cases, such as:
Multiple breaches
Repeat offenders
This includes enforcement action, such as:
Composition sums (a fine instead of prosecution)
Court prosecution
Eradication
ACRA can strike off a company's name from its register if there is reason to believe it is no longer in business.
ACRA's approach to enforcement
ACRA maintains a regulatory regime that is progressive, responsive, and effective to safeguard Singapore's reputation as a trusted and business-friendly marketplace.
Our enforcement philosophy is to encourage compliance and deter misconduct.
We do not investigate every statutory breach. When we do investigate, we respond to different types of breaches in different ways using one or more regulatory tools available to us.
Who should read this
Business owners, officers and corporate service providers (CSPs): Understand ACRA's enforcement approach to help you comply with regulations and avoid penalties.
Those making complaints and under investigation: Understand which cases get investigated.
What ACRA investigates
To use our limited resources effectively, we consider three key factors before deciding whether to take enforcement action. If a complaint meets all three factors, we will decide whether to investigate and what regulatory tool to use.
Factor 1: Public interest
ACRA investigates breaches that affect public interest and the accuracy of our public registers.
Members of the public, investors, and banks rely on our registers for accurate business information.
Public interest considerations
Key concerns | Details |
|---|---|
Accuracy and integrity of ACRA's public registers | ACRA's top concern is maintaining accurate and complete public registers. We will investigate and take enforcement action against companies that fail to file annual returns. We generally investigate when companies or officers fail to update changes to directors or registered office addresses |
Timely and accurate financial information | ACRA investigates when companies fail to file timely and accurate financial information that meets accounting standards. This applies especially to:
The public relies on this financial information for business and investment decisions. |
Fraud, false declarations, and dishonest behaviour | ACRA or relevant enforcement agencies will investigate fraud, false declarations, and other forms of dishonest behaviour that affect our:
Example: A CSP who was not paid director's fees abused their access by filing a false declaration with ACRA. The false declaration stated that someone else had consented to be a director in their place. They also backdated the filing to the date they were appointed, as if they were never a director at all. ACRA took enforcement action against this offender. |
Breach of fiduciary duties | Under section 157 of the Companies Act, a director must at all times act honestly and use reasonable diligence in carrying out their duties. ACRA is prepared to investigate and take enforcement action when:
|
Factor 2: Harm caused by the breach
ACRA prioritises cases which cause serious harm, based on the following considerations.
Extent of harm: Considerations
Considerations | Details |
|---|---|
Extent of harm | We assess:
|
Intent | We consider whether the breach was either:
For certain filing errors, ACRA may simply require a correction and not pursue the matter further. Example: You made a genuine typographical error, such as typing the wrong number for your registered office address. |
Remedial action | We consider whether the offender made any of these:
|
Other available remedies | We consider whether the complainant has better recourse through civil action in court. Example: A company decides not to register share transfers in favour of an investor due to contractual or commercial disputes about the circumstances. |
Factor 3: Valid complaints with enough evidence
Your complaint must be valid and supported by sufficient evidence. ACRA's investigation and enforcement resources must be justified and prioritised.
Valid complaint requirements
Requirements for valid complaints | Details |
|---|---|
No anonymous complaints | You must include your name and contact details. We do not accept anonymous complaints. |
Not arising from personal or contractual disputes | Many alleged breaches of ACRA-administered legislation arise from disputes between private parties. As a national regulator, ACRA's resources are generally used only to investigate and enforce cases that involve public interest. If there is no public interest, we will advise you to resolve the matter privately and to rectify the alleged breach. |
Cooperative complainant | You must respond when ACRA requests clarification or additional evidence. |
Quality and relevant evidence | Your complaint must be supported by evidence that contains enough details to start investigations and establish that an offence occurred. You need to provide:
The source of the evidence must be credible and capable of being verified. |
No hidden agenda or vested interest | The complainant should not have any hidden agenda or vested interest in making the complaint. Example of a hidden agenda: Using ACRA's enforcement action to gain advantage in civil proceedings or in the management of the affected business. |
No adverse records with ACRA | The complainant should not have adverse records with ACRA. Example: The complainant is under a warrant of arrest for failing to answer an ACRA summons. |
What ACRA does not investigate
ACRA focuses on cases involving public interest. Most contractual disputes and personal disputes will not be investigated.
Examples: Disputes ACRA will not investigate
Types of dispute | Examples |
|---|---|
Unpaid fees |
|
Investment disputes |
|
Note: Providing false information is a crime, and may result in a fine or imprisonment (or both).
Regulatory tools ACRA may use
ACRA may apply one or more of these tools:
Denial of service
Required attendance at an outreach session
Warning letter
Offer to pay a composition sum instead of prosecution
Striking off
Disqualification
Debarment order
Prosecution (we may seek deterrent sentences for serious cases)
The tool we use depends on the nature and severity of the breach.
Referring cases to other agencies
We may refer certain cases to other law enforcement agencies or regulators when appropriate. This includes cases that involve:
Criminal offences outside ACRA's purview
Criminal breach of trust under the Penal Code
Security-related offences under the Securities and Futures Act
Agencies we may refer to
Singapore Police Force
Commercial Affairs Department
Other relevant regulators
Related pages
ACRA’s investigation process: What to expect
Understand your obligations when ACRA investigates you or your company, including possible outcomes.
Common offences for local companies
Learn about common company offences under Singapore's Companies Act 1967, including penalties for registration, filing, and director offences.
Company directors’ duties & key obligations
Learn your key responsibilities as a company director and find out more about penalties for non-compliance.
